So, I’ve been delving further into the OSR and its
origins. In addition to acquiring PDFs
of original rulesets and adventures, I started reading The Dragon from the
beginning. I learn more and more with
each issue read.
I never really had access to the origin of the hobby. My best friend Courtney was my gateway to
most things RPG, although there were other avenues. When he was the DM, we played mostly 2e,
which was a grand adventure through the Temple of Elemental Evil (surprising we
were running a 1e adventure in 2e). He
had 1e books and a subscription to The Dragon, but most of that was
contemporary with the crossover from 1e to 2e.
Reading The Dragon from the beginning resembles
archaeology. I feel invigorated by my
discoveries. Learning new things about a
game I felt I knew thrills me. I think
that may be the beauty of D&D; it is so simple to learn and grasp, but so
open-ended as to allow a nigh-infinite number of permutations. I felt I knew D&D, but I am learning it
is like a wadded-up piece of paper; tight, small, but with layers and nooks and
crannies.
Quick example that taught me a lot about both 0e and the
OSR: The Dragon #17 has an article on
page 32 by Stephen Dorneman about angels in D&D. “There is a need for beings powerful, yet not
omnipotent, who would be in the service of the good gods. And so, in
keeping with the Judeo-Christian tradition of D&D, propose the
creation of a new class of supernatural beings, Angels.” Check out what I emphasized in that quote;
this is something I have read about on +James Maliszewski's Grognardia and
other old-school blogs. The traditional
interpretation of the cleric is that he is based on Dr. Van Helsing as
portrayed in the Hammer films, with a distinctly Christian slant. The quote also illuminates the cleric as
portrayed by +James Raggi in Lamentations of the Flame Princess.
Stuff like this is why it is important to look back; not
only can you learn about the origins of the hobby, but also you learn about
modern OSR decisions. By no means am I
saying the quote is absolute; it is listed as a “D&D variant” article. Nor am I saying this is why the cleric is the
way it is in LotFP. What I am saying is
it helps me understand more about the hobby overall, which, like all knowledge,
is invaluable.
No comments:
Post a Comment